Senators seek bigger firepower for U.S. securities regulator

 

A couple of bi-partisan Senators are pushing a bill to add real weight behind SEC punishments against securities violators. As of now, penalties amount to more of a slap-on-the-wrist, and financial instituions make more money by violating and paying the minor penalties.

The push to change the system has long been mired by lobbyists who pay a fortune to politicians to keep this ridiculous status quo, but recently judges have tossed out the minor settlements/penalties and forced parties to go back and decide on something that’s an actual punishment.

Here’s to the change, but expect to hear cries of socialism and over-regulation.  — Ryno

 

By Sarah N. Lynch and Alexandra Alper

WASHINGTON | Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:16pm EDT

Found on www.reuters.com

Senators are planning to introduce a bipartisan bill on Monday to give the country’s securities regulator the authority to seek tougher fines for alleged Wall Street criminals.

The bill, sponsored by Rhode Island Democrat Jack Reed and Iowa Republican Chuck Grassley, would boost the penalties that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission can seek from firms and individuals accused of wrongdoing and triple the cap on funds the agency can seek from repeat offenders.

“If a fine is just decimal dust for a Wall Street firm, that’s not a deterrent,” Grassley said in a statement. “A penalty should mean something.”

The bill comes only months after SEC Chairwoman Mary Schapiro asked Congress to boost the agency’s firepower, after a federal judge in New York tossed out two SEC settlements over paltry penalties.

On the same November day that Schapiro spelled out her legislative wish-list to Congress, U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff threw out the SEC’s proposed $285 million settlement with Citigroup Inc, calling the monetary fine “pocket change.” He also said investors were being “short-changed.”

The SEC had alleged investors lost $700 million from the bad bets, while Citigroup had planned to give up $160 million in ill-gotten profit.

The SEC is still in the process of appealing the ruling.

In 2009, the same judge also rejected a proposed settlement with Bank of America Corp until the two parties agreed to raise the figure.

President Barack Obama echoed Schapiro’s concerns in December, during a campaign style speech in Kansas, where he said he’d call for legislation to make “penalties count.”

Grassley and Reed’s legislation would hew closely to what Schapiro requested.

The SEC can currently penalize individuals up to $150,000 per violation and up to $725,000 per entity. Under the bill, those numbers would go up to $1 million and $10 million, respectively.

It would also triple the penalty cap for repeat offenders who have been convicted of securities fraud within the past five years. The agency would also have the power to assess the penalties in-house without having to go to federal court, a change from current law.

Crucially, the SEC could also seek three times the amount of ill-gotten gains or investor losses.

In a recent SEC settlement cited by the Senators, former Bear Stearns hedge fund managers were forced to pay civil penalties totaling about $1 million, after being indicted for defrauding investors out of $1.6 billion.

 

See on Scoop.it – Horn-y News