Maybe. Just don’t look too closely behind the scenes, or else you’ll find out that …
#5. The Olympic Village Is a Nonstop Orgy
In each Olympics, the athletes stay in a small area nearby that is referred to as Olympic Village. They could also call it Boneropolis, or perhaps Sexsylvania, because these villages have become infamous for being festivals of sexual depravity.
Imagine living in a town populated by young, toned, athletic mini-gods at the peak of their physical prime. Imagine that they’ve all dedicated years of their lives to disciplining their hot, fatless bodies for a shot to live in this little town for a few weeks. And here they are, all 10,000 of them, minus their parents and spouses and the daily regimens that have governed their lives up to this point, in an exotic location, with lots of spare time. Let’s put it this way: At the 1988 Seoul games, there was such a problem with used condoms showing up on the roof of the British men’s housing that the Olympic Association had to ban outdoor sex.
Can you imagine a crisis of condom littering so profound that an official ban on publicly whipping out your Olympic-quality junk was required? Can you fathom the degrading conversation that had to occur between Olympic officials and grizzled coaches to get this ban enacted? And it was no isolated situation — from what we can tell, every single Olympic Village since, well, ever, has been knee-deep in genital juice.
By 1992, Olympic organizers got so worried about the frenetic sexing that they started giving athletes free condoms just to keep the AIDS at bay. By the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics, 100,000 condoms were distributed to about 6,500 athletes and officials. That’s about 15 condoms per person. AND THE 100,000 CONDOMS WEREN’T ENOUGH. Halfway through the games, anemergency shipment of rubbers was brought in to fill the gap. And that’s not even touching how much unprotected sex these guys were having. So what we’re trying to say is that not even Las Vegas or Copulation Town, USA, can compete with the coitusathon occurring in the streets of an Olympic Village.
#4. The Host City Is Temporarily Turned into a Police State
In order to recoup the enormous expenditure it takes to host the games, the hosts need big time international brand sponsors. And as the hosts, they have the right to let only those major brands sell their wares in and around the games. Fair enough.
Unless, that is, you’re a London mom and pop store hoping to capitalize on this once in a lifetime opportunity. Too bad, because you’d better not even THINK about using common words like “Games,” “2012″ “Gold,” “Silver,” “Bronze,” “London,” “Medals,” “Sponsors” and “Summer” in your signs or products. If you accidentally combine any of these words while advertising for your small business, it’s a $30,000 fine.
So that’s weird, but if you’re trying to save your country from bankruptcy, some deals with the devil have to be made. It’s ugly, but no one wants to end up like Greece (more on that later).
But let’s say that, for whatever reason, which probably has to do with the fact that the Olympics murdered your parents and left you a wealthy vigilante orphan, you’re against the Olympics altogether. Don’t expect to use your freedom of speech to voice your anger against sports-themed injustices. The IOC demands that during the games, special rights be given to the host city. Not just strutting rights among the other cities of their nation, although that’s a given, but also the right to squash all local laws regarding free speech. The London contract, for example, spells out that all billboards throughout the city must be rented by the city and that only sponsors of the games will be able to use them. If anyone wants to put up an anti-Olympics billboard, they are banned. Police even have the power to enter your house and rip down an anti-Olympics sign.
In London, the creepy Big Brother aspect of the Olympics “brand police” has led to a whole genre of protest art by underground artists. Just incorporating the Olympics logo into their work is an act of defiance — a lingerie store was forced to take down a window display using five hula hoops and some bras to mimic the Olympic rings, presumably out of fear that people would mistake that for the entrance to the Olympic Village.
#3. Hosting Will Bankrupt Your Country
Cities all over the world get down and dirty for a shot at bringing the globe’s greatest games to their country. It’s like the Hunger Games of the adult world, only without the starvation, murder and incest (we haven’t read The Hunger Games). Getting chosen to host the Olympics is a tacit acknowledgment that your city is awesome and worthy of the eyes of the whole planet. Do you think anyone is going to campaign to bring the Olympics to Little Rock, Arkansas, or Cleveland? Hosting the Olympics means your city will be remembered and respected for decades. Is there any other honor greater than that?
But there’s a price to getting the privilege of hosting the Olympics, and that price might be your entire economy. Greece learned the lesson the hard way.
Greece’s initial budget for the 2004 games was 4.5 billion euros, but the actual cost of the games quickly doubled that estimate. When all was said and done, the cost of the games was 5 percent of Greece’s GDP, and eight years later, the country hasn’t recovered from the debt. The city of Vancouver has given up on recovering all the money it put into its fancy schmancy Olympic Village condos that were later converted into residential homes. Today the buildings form a ghost town, and city officials are struggling to come up with a way to just break even on them.
The Nagano Winter Olympics in 1998 plunged the city into a recession, with the tax burden of the games ending up costing around $30,000 per family in the city. And none of these financial disasters compare to Montreal (Greece pending). Their Olympic stadium wasn’t finished until 11 years after the games ended, and it took no less than 30 years to pay down the debt incurred to host the 1976 Olympics.
Which completely explains why the people of Bern, Switzerland, voted down their chance to host the 2010 games. And why Detroit wisely stopped bidding for the “honor” by 1972.
All of this is especially baffling when you consider …